This makes me angry.
For all the stupidity that runs around this planet it never fails to amaze that the words "reasonable doubt" are never fully understood. If you, yes YOU, know nothing else about the legal system it is this:
Convictions should almost never happen.
I'll qualify this a little: trial-by-jury criminal cases should almost never get convictions.
Why?
Because the defense doesn't have to prove jack, and the prosecution has to prove everything that was, as time rips the ability to portray an accurate picture.
Could they do it? Yeah. Motive and means were surely available.
Did they possibly do it? It is within the realm of possibility.
DID they do it? Couldn't say. Sounds like the investigation was done by a man named Cletus who couldn't spell "DNA," let alone successfully collect a sample. That and not finding a murder weapon or how the heck it was done should've closed the book on a 1st degree murder case. 2nd or 3rd would've been more plausible (but still shouldn't have gotten a conviction, based on the story).
Even the prosecution suggests that they were in coitus and interrupted, as a possible scenario for how the murder happened.
Oh, and I love John Stewart.
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen